<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2-ppt DokuWiki" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.fossology.org/lib/styles/feed.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/feed.php">
        <title>FOSSology</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/lib/images/favicon.ico" />
       <dc:date>2008-11-20T12:52:28-07:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task_list?rev=1227207751&amp;do=diff1227207751"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task:stop_running_filter_clean?rev=1227207698&amp;do=diff1227207698"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task:analyze_license_deltas?rev=1227207578&amp;do=diff1227207578"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task:provide_analysis_to_osi_license_proliferation_sub-group?rev=1227207517&amp;do=diff1227207517"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task:create_package_ontology?rev=1227207371&amp;do=diff1227207371"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/roadmap?rev=1227207259&amp;do=diff1227207259"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/task:define_test_implement_full_backup_recovery_process_for_rfo?rev=1227207139&amp;do=diff1227207139"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/home?rev=1226519675&amp;do=diff1226519675"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/release_notes?rev=1226515978&amp;do=diff1226515978"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/building_debian_packages?rev=1226401883&amp;do=diff1226401883"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fossology.org/screenshots?rev=1226354634&amp;do=diff1226354634"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/lib/images/favicon.ico">
        <title>FOSSology</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/</link>
        <url>http://www.fossology.org/lib/images/favicon.ico</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task_list?rev=1227207751&amp;do=diff1227207751">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T12:02:31-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task_list</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task_list?rev=1227207751&amp;do=diff1227207751</link>
        <description>This page will capture a 3-tiered task list for the FOSSology project.



	*  Task List
	*  Roadmap
	*  Project Team



 These tasks should map to the Roadmap.

These tasks should have assigned owners from the Project Team.

 

Current Tasks

 This is a list of the project’s current tasks.  This is what we’re working on now.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task:stop_running_filter_clean?rev=1227207698&amp;do=diff1227207698">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T12:01:38-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task:stop_running_filter_clean - created</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task:stop_running_filter_clean?rev=1227207698&amp;do=diff1227207698</link>
        <description>Notes from bobg, 2008-10-25...

The first thing we do in a license analysis is a filter_license.  When we’re all done we delete them (in filter_clean).  What if we add a new license or make changes?  DO we always have to start over with a new filter_license?  Bobg thinks the answer is not always…  But filter_license runs pretty quickly, in some cases it does need to be re-run.   The model we have now works, but may not be the most efficient.  Also this is very bSAM-specific</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task:analyze_license_deltas?rev=1227207578&amp;do=diff1227207578">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T11:59:38-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task:analyze_license_deltas</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task:analyze_license_deltas?rev=1227207578&amp;do=diff1227207578</link>
        <description>On Jun 20, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Ragavan S wrote: 
&gt; Hi fossologists,
&gt;
&gt; Here's the scenario:
&gt;
&gt; We run a license analysis of product version 1.0 through FOSSology.
&gt; Product version 1.1 comes along and we run a license analysis (assume 
&gt; no changes to the license database). We would like to see a report on 
&gt; just the deltas between the two versions.
&gt;
&gt; Question: What's the recommended way to accomplish this?
 Bobg replies...</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task:provide_analysis_to_osi_license_proliferation_sub-group?rev=1227207517&amp;do=diff1227207517">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T11:58:37-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task:provide_analysis_to_osi_license_proliferation_sub-group - created</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task:provide_analysis_to_osi_license_proliferation_sub-group?rev=1227207517&amp;do=diff1227207517</link>
        <description>This is an engagement bobg is working on with the Open Source Initiative, see &lt;http://www.opensource.org/proliferation-report&gt; 

According to bobg, “We can help them out with some specific queries – not something FO needs to do itself, but helpful for the usage of FO;  High priority (NOW is when this stuff is being discussed)”</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task:create_package_ontology?rev=1227207371&amp;do=diff1227207371">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T11:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task:create_package_ontology</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task:create_package_ontology?rev=1227207371&amp;do=diff1227207371</link>
        <description>Package ontology

 (from paw) 
  Question: What is synonymous to the Debian Package apache2 in RedHat? 
  Answer: httpd, they are both binaries of the Apache http Server from the Apache Software Foundation 
 Did you know that these packages are equivalent?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/roadmap?rev=1227207259&amp;do=diff1227207259">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T11:54:19-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>roadmap</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/roadmap?rev=1227207259&amp;do=diff1227207259</link>
        <description>This document contains roadmap info for FOSSology 

   

	*  Task List
	*  Roadmap
	*  Project Team



This release info should reference the Task List.

This release info should be tied to members of the Project team.

 

Release stream

0.8.0 (complete, 27 May 2008)

 Release target:  15 May 2008</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/task:define_test_implement_full_backup_recovery_process_for_rfo?rev=1227207139&amp;do=diff1227207139">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-20T11:52:19-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>task:define_test_implement_full_backup_recovery_process_for_rfo</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/task:define_test_implement_full_backup_recovery_process_for_rfo?rev=1227207139&amp;do=diff1227207139</link>
        <description>*  Currently, there is a 4 day rotating archive of the db on rfo.  should it be longer?
	*  Start “off-site” backups on rfo (similar to what is currently done with fossbazaar &amp; fossology); the archives are stored locally on rfo.  Advice is needed (from Matt?) on how to do proper backups.
	*  Define &amp; test the recovery process.
		*  database recovery  (Mary)</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/home?rev=1226519675&amp;do=diff1226519675">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-12T12:54:35-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>home</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/home?rev=1226519675&amp;do=diff1226519675</link>
        <description>Our mission is to build a community to facilitate the study of Free and Open Source Software by providing free data analysis tools.

 

A release candidate of FOSSology version 1.0 is now available for testing.

We are working on a new release of FOSSology. Things are looking really good and we think we are getting close to release. The current code is easier to install, faster, more accurate, and the best version of FOSSology yet.  There still might be some bugs, but we think it’s ready for w…</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/release_notes?rev=1226515978&amp;do=diff1226515978">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-12T11:52:58-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dan Stangel</dc:creator>
        <title>release_notes - Split super long line included in the 0.6.0 release notes</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/release_notes?rev=1226515978&amp;do=diff1226515978</link>
        <description>This page maintains the FOSSology Project release notes, from the most recent release to the oldest release.

1.0.0

Date:  11 November 2008 

	*  Completely redesigned build and release system that standardizes many file locations, environment variables, and other parameters important to FOSSology.  It also conforms to open source software community norms and expectations for software builds and installations;  separates the build- time assumptions and dependencies from the install-time, making…</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/building_debian_packages?rev=1226401883&amp;do=diff1226401883">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-11T04:11:23-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Matt Taggart</dc:creator>
        <title>building_debian_packages</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/building_debian_packages?rev=1226401883&amp;do=diff1226401883</link>
        <description>Building FOSSology Debian packages

Building packages for testing

	*  update VERSION in Makefile.conf to an SVN prerelease version, example: 1.0.0~20081106
	*  Create or update the top entry in debian/changelog to match that version, with a -1 debian version, with a single bullet saying “unofficial svn testing”. There should only ever be one entry of this type and it should be at the top  and will not remain in the file for any releases.
	*  commit Makefile.conf and debian/changelog
	*  fro…</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fossology.org/screenshots?rev=1226354634&amp;do=diff1226354634">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-11-10T15:03:54-07:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Mike Ruscio</dc:creator>
        <title>screenshots</title>
        <link>http://www.fossology.org/screenshots?rev=1226354634&amp;do=diff1226354634</link>
        <description>These are sample screen shots of some interesting parts of the User Interface. 
 For screen shots with explanations of all UI menu options, click here:  Overview of the User Interface

Welcome - Mozilla and IE Browsers

  



Fossology Dashboard</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
